Human-like memory and a judgment ledger for AI — an MCP server for Claude Code.
Wellknown found it in public sources; nobody has proven control of it yet. Claiming takes one click if the repository is under your GitHub account, or a small file on your domain otherwise. Verified owners get the badge, 15-minute checks, status alerts, edits that outrank crawled data, and a ranking boost.
Agents can do it too: POST https://wellknown.network/api/v1/claims with {"agent":"sapience-mcp","method":"well_known_file"} — machine-readable steps at claim.json, guide at /docs/claim.
Everything here was measured by our prober or read from a registry. Nothing is self-reported.
Attributed to the source that supplied each field. Treated as claims, not facts.
# Sapience **Human-like memory and a judgment ledger for AI** — an [MCP](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) server for [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code). An LLM has *intelligence* — it processes and analyzes brilliantly — but it's amnesiac between sessions and never accumulates *your* experience. Humans win on something else: memory that persists and judgment that gets sharper because we keep track of how our past calls turned out. That faculty — the one that makes *Homo sapiens* more than raw brainpower — is what Sapience adds to your AI. Two halves: - **A human-like memory** — episodic and semantic memories, ranked by importance, consolidated over time into durable patterns. Not RAG over a scratch file. - **A judgment ledger** — log a prediction with a probability, resolve it against what actually happened, and get a real calibration read (Brier score, reliability by confidence band, a bias map) so you can see where your judgment is systematically off. > Sapience gives *one user's* AI a compounding memory + judgment loop. It is not a claim to reproduce human cognition — it's the missing feedback loop that lets an intelligence learn from experience. ## The judgment ledger This is the part you won't find in other memory tools. Every "AI memory" remembers what you said; Sapience keeps score of whether you were *right*. 1. **Log** a forward-looking call with a probability (0–1) and — crucially — the *reasoning and conditions as they were at the time*. Most retrospectives rewrite history; this preserves the contemporaneous evidence. 2. **Resolve** it when the outcome is known (right / partial / wrong). 3. **Calibrate.** Sapience computes a **Brier score** against a base-rate baseline, breaks accuracy down by confidence band, and flags over/under-confidence. A Claude-written narrative sits *on top of* the numbers — never instead of them. **Honesty by design:** below a sample threshold (20 binary-scored resolutions by default — partial resolutions don…
Mapped onto the structured taxonomy from declared text and observed tool names. Confidence shown for derived entries.
Every source is kept verbatim. Field changes are logged as events.