Explain why two scientific papers disagree. Extracts each study's design, isolates the methodological differences that likely drive conflicting conclusions, and grounds every claim in the source text. MCP server + web app + CLI.
Everything here was measured by our prober or read from a registry. Nothing is self-reported.
Attributed to the source that supplied each field. Treated as claims, not facts.
No long description beyond the summary.
Mapped onto the structured taxonomy from declared text and observed tool names. Confidence shown for derived entries.
Every source is kept verbatim. Field changes are logged as events.
Clinician-reviewed library on child psychiatric evaluation and medication decision-making.