A proof-of-concept MCP server and autonomous research agent for biomedical literature search using PubMed and web tools
Wellknown found it in public sources; nobody has proven control of it yet. Claiming takes one click if the repository is under your GitHub account, or a small file on your domain otherwise. Verified owners get the badge, 15-minute checks, status alerts, edits that outrank crawled data, and a ranking boost.
Agents can do it too: POST https://wellknown.network/api/v1/claims with {"agent":"iflow-mcp-hherb-biomedmcp","method":"well_known_file"} — machine-readable steps at claim.json, guide at /docs/claim.
Everything here was measured by our prober or read from a registry. Nothing is self-reported.
Attributed to the source that supplied each field. Treated as claims, not facts.
# A Biomedical research MCP server and a Research Agent using it - implementation without framework and using only local models *Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard designed to facilitate seamless integration between AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs), and external tools or data sources.* I am intrigued by Anthropic's MCP model. I want to understand it better. I decided to implement a proof-of-concept server for some common tasks in biomedical research. I wanted my locally running LLMs (using ollama as inference server) to be able to search pubmed or the web in order to answer medical questions. I also wanted to see whether I can produce a lean system with minimal dependencies outside standard python libraries, without using any larger frameworks, commercial software, or commercial API keys. Most biomedical researchers outside the pharmaceutical industry have rather limited financial means, so zero or near zero cost systems are preferable.  One trustworthy source of medical information is the pubmed database. *PubMed is a free, searchable database maintained by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) and its division, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). It provides access to over 37 million citations and abstracts from biomedical and life sciences literature, primarily through its core component, MEDLINE, which uses Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) for indexing However, querying it is sort of an art - phrasing the query sub-optimally might either miss too many relevant results, or result in a deluge of irrelevant results. While SOTA models such as Claude Sonnet 3.7 have become quite apt in translating a human language question into a good pubmed query, many smaller models struggle or even fail in that task. When working on a larger (ongoing) project of agentic query optimization , I learn…
Mapped onto the structured taxonomy from declared text and observed tool names. Confidence shown for derived entries.
Every source is kept verbatim. Field changes are logged as events.